Op-ed: On Pope Francis, Economic Justice & Reproductive Rights

Pope Francis has come to the United States to preach about economic justice amid an unprecedented attack on reproductive rights.

Anti-choice advocates no longer simply try  to criminalize abortion. Now, most legislative attacks are part of a strategy that relies on steadily implementing incremental restrictions with the goal of reserving safe and legal abortion as a luxury of the rich.

Women’s Law Project Executive Director Carol Tracy and Kate Michelman, co-chair of WomenVote PA, wrote about this connection on the even of Pope Francis’ historic visit to Philadelphia.

From the piece:

We, like many leaders in the reproductive rights and women’s rights movement, were baptized and raised as Catholics. Like many Catholics, we left because we could no longer continue to be part of a church whose doctrine denigrated the moral integrity of women. Catholic Church doctrine is not the only morally informed perspective on reproductive rights and abortion.

We believe the current assault on reproductive rights, which strives to reserve the access to contraception and safe abortion for the rich, is fundamentally immoral. We not only believe, but know, that women make morally informed reproductive decisions, including whether or not to terminate a pregnancy, every day.

And so we are watching this week with decidedly mixed emotions: nostalgia, anger, concern and hope.

We admire and respect Pope Francis. He brings us back to the memory of John XXIII, who was elected pope when we came of age. Like John, Pope Francis is shifting the church from dogma to pastoral care rooted in compassion, mercy and inclusion. He has criticized the church for “putting dogma before love, and for prioritizing moral doctrines over serving the poor and marginalized.”

Having become acutely aware of increasing income inequality in recent years, Americans are ready for this message. Not only do 85 percent of American Catholics approve of Pope Francis, but seven out of 10 Americans as a whole.

In 2013, Pope Francis criticized the church for being “obsessed” with abortion, gay marriage and contraception. “The dogmatic and moral teachings of the church are not all equivalent,” he said. “The church’s pastoral ministry cannot be obsessed with the transmission of a disjointed multitude of doctrines to be imposed insistently.”

In early September, Pope Francis released a statement addressing abortion. Specifically, the pope authorized priests to grant “forgiveness” to a woman for having had an abortion, if she seeks such absolution. We know that women can and do make their own moral decisions about whether they can bear and raise a child and do not need forgiveness. However, a wider analysis of the pope’s position reveals that his language is far less stigmatizing than the policies and practices of the U.S. church, and in fact his emphasis on a pastoral, rather than political, approach to abortion is indeed radical.

While we recognize that church dogma about abortion and contraception is not likely to change in the near future, Pope Francis’ decision to shift the conversation is illuminating the disparities between his emphasis on compassion, inclusivity and mercy and the practices and policies espoused by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, the public policy arm of the U.S. Catholic Church.

This chasm is particularly severe in Pennsylvania, where health policy regulating women’s access to reproductive health care, including but not limited to contraception and abortion, has been shaped by the political influence of the Pennsylvania Catholic Conference.

Restrictions on abortion has earned our state high marks from anti-choice organizations, and recognition as a model “pro-life” state. Yet Pennsylvania consistently ranks low across all factors measuring women’s health and economic security. This is not a moral model to be held up as a good example.

This correlation reflects the reality across the country; research shows a correlation between the number of abortion restrictions and low marks for women’s health. Philadelphia’s maternal mortality rate is the highest in the United States, and the United States has the highest maternal and infant mortality rates of any industrialized nation. This needless suffering is stratified by race and class.

No matter what your personal beliefs about abortion, the fact is there is no economic justice without reproductive freedom. Women need to be able to choose if and when to have children to fully participate in the economy, a fact that is more obvious than ever given the widening gap between the haves and the have-nots, and the lack of sufficient workplace protections for working mothers.

It remains to be seen if the U.S. church will heed the words of Pope Francis, and choose to focus on ministering to the poor, and leave the health care to doctors and experts. We would certainly all be better off if they did.

Pennsylvania’s current crisis is the result of an incoherent perspective: A society that deprives women of reproductive freedom because it fundamentally mistrusts women also deprives mothers, and families, of health and dignity.

If you haven’t already, please click here to like #FrancisLovesMeToo, a campaign that welcomes the Pope to Philadelphia while calling for real, evidence-based policies of inclusion that promote economic justice.

Stay up to date on this topic, the PA Campaign for Women’s Health, and policy related to the status of women and girls in Pennsylvania by following us on twitter and tumblr and liking us on Facebook

Founded in 1974, the Women’s Law Project is the only public interest law center devoted to women’s rights in Pennsylvania. WLP is a founding member of the PA Campaign for Women’s Health, a growing collaboration of organizations and individuals calling for an end to ideological politics trumping common-sense policy solutions in Pennsylvania. 

 

 

About womenslawproject

The Women's Law Project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. To this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education.
This entry was posted in Abortion and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.